

- #Does iridient x transformer support lossless files software#
- #Does iridient x transformer support lossless files professional#
- #Does iridient x transformer support lossless files mac#
#Does iridient x transformer support lossless files software#
The software lets you set lots of settings to apply during the decoding process. It effectively lets you use Iridient’s decoding engine in Lightroom. This way, when you import the resulting files into Lightroom, you’re bypassing the Lightroom raw decoding process, but you are still able to use the files as if they were raw files. This process converts the RAW data to RGB data but retains the advantages of using a raw file, such as highlight recovery and so on. The software converts Fuji X-Trans files to DNG from the native RAF, and during the process demosaics the images using Irident’s own engine. If you haven’t used it before, or come across it, Iridient X-Transformer is a new piece of software (currently still in beta) from the makers of Iridient Developer. However, if you’re looking for somewhere to start, then have a look, try the recommendations, and judge for yourself. As always, I based these on my preferences, and so, you may prefer a different approach. In this post, I’ll outline the settings that I’m now using and some other tips for using the software. After lots of testing and trying various combinations, I’ve come up with what I believe is the best approach to take if you prefer natural looking images.
#Does iridient x transformer support lossless files mac#
It does not store any personal data.Now that Iridient X-Transformer has been out on the Mac for a little while I’ve had a chance to play around with it for a bit.

The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".

This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. JPEG from Lightroom Enhanced Details DNG | Aunt Molly Road, Hopewell Township | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR JPEG from Iridient X-Transformer DNG created with Smoother RAW Process | Aunt Molly Road, Hopewell Township | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR JPEG from RAF | Aunt Molly Road, Hopewell Township | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR JPEG from Iridient X-Transformer DNG created with More Detailed RAW Process | Aunt Molly Road, Hopewell Township | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR Iridient X-Transformer Settings Iridient X-Transformer Settings Iridient X-Transformer Settings I left the sharpening and noise reduction at the Adobe Lightroom defaults.

I made adjustments to exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, whites, blacks, vibrancy, and saturation. The featured image in this blog post is a FujiFilm X-T2 RAF post-processed in Adobe Lightroom. I don’t recall anyone suggesting that I use a pair of binoculars or a magnifying glass so that I could better appreciate the work. I’ve visited many art and photography galleries in my lifetime.
#Does iridient x transformer support lossless files professional#
However, if you are a photographer, professional or amateur, for whom the technical bits of photography is not the main point, then I think you must do whatever produces the results you want, even if it’s the SOOC JPEG. If you are a professional photographer, aka someone whose source of income is photography, who must produce the best technical image, the difference may be of concern to you. – that there’s very little practical difference. I think that once an image has been post-processed, then downsized and compressed for the web – most photographs are being shared online via blogs, Instagram, Facebook, etc. Other photographers have taken a “zoom in until you find a difference” approach, testing the software, only to discover that the difference varies very subtlely between photographs and other factors help make the decision. I think it’s mostly ignorance from some photographers. The buzz around the web is that Adobe Lightroom does a shitty job with the handling of RAW FujiFilm X-Trans files and that Iridient X-Transformer is the fix.
